Note: Porn manipulates both men and women to be both consumers and commodities.
We are presenting the most common presentations where the male is regarded as the consumer while the female is forced into the role of commodity.
We are presenting the most common presentations where the male is regarded as the consumer while the female is forced into the role of commodity.
The Making of a Commodity
The above process can happen to males also. They are prompted to 'score' as many hits as possible in order to prove their manhood/prowess in order to gain value in the eyes of others. A male who scores or 'beds down' a lot of women or who has multiple hook-ups is supposedly somehow desireable. He's a stud and supposed to be admired by many males who are 'unable' to get 'laid' very often. Quantity never makes up for lack of quality. It is the wounding of the childhood concept of self that causes both men and women to seek reassurance of their value by trying to provoke expression from others of our value. We need to learn that we have innate value just because we exist. No one can take that value away from us. We need to treat all our human family members in the way that shows we all have the same value. Treat others the way we would like to be treated ourselves - with respect for our privacy and with dignity.
What is the process that takes a baby girl and develops her into a porn performer?
What is the pay-off that shapes the girl's mind so that she agrees to forever lose her intimate privacy and accept public sexual exposure?
Why does she accept sexual violence and emotional abuse and consider it to be evidence of her being sexy?
What anchors her sexuality to those abusive behaviours?
Why can't she identify abuse?
Why is she drawn to abuse?
What is the pay-off that shapes the girl's mind so that she agrees to forever lose her intimate privacy and accept public sexual exposure?
Why does she accept sexual violence and emotional abuse and consider it to be evidence of her being sexy?
What anchors her sexuality to those abusive behaviours?
Why can't she identify abuse?
Why is she drawn to abuse?
The Religion of Porn
The religions of the world demonstrate the power of belief to influence human behaviour. Porn makes use of the same strategies.
Porn certainly seems to be a religion for many of its adherents who worship at its many shrines for excessively long hours. The religion of porn dominates and influences and even controls multitudes in their daily 'choices' impacting emotional, physical, mental, financial, and spiritual spheres. Porn also dominates relationships but especially intimate relationships. The whole being is impacted when one worships at the shrine of porn. The deity of porn is UNLOVE - the absence of LOVE. UNLOVE is a god who does not acknowledge the innate value of human beings. UNLOVE masquerades as an unbalanced form of SELF - where self-indulgence is practised without regard to its effect on others.
When the majority of society worships the god of porn, society changes and becomes pornified and the members of that society reflect the character of the god that they worship. They become unloving to others. They become pornified. Their society becomes pornified. The children grow up without any understanding of what an un-pornified society is like. To be pornified is their 'normal.' To be sexually unloving to others, to be uncaring about how selfish sexual actions affect others, is to be pornified.
When the majority of society worships the god of porn, society changes and becomes pornified and the members of that society reflect the character of the god that they worship. They become unloving to others. They become pornified. Their society becomes pornified. The children grow up without any understanding of what an un-pornified society is like. To be pornified is their 'normal.' To be sexually unloving to others, to be uncaring about how selfish sexual actions affect others, is to be pornified.
Historically, religious adherents were taught to self-flagellate. Self-flagellating involved beating oneself with a whip with embedded knots or with sharp shards which when struck against the flesh, would cause pain and draw blood. This theology was known as The Doctrine of the Mortification of the Flesh. The belief was that when 'God' supposedly witnessed the penitants' suffering and bloodshed, He would be prompted to allow sinners to be forgiven of their sins and the dead sinners to enter into heaven. The penitants voluntarily and repeatedly caused themselves severe pain and suffering because they believed their pain was beneficial to others and that they were especially 'called' to that 'sacred' role. They believed that they deserved to suffer and that it was God's plan for them to suffer. Some religious adherents still practice mortification of the flesh today.
Photos from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flagellant and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discipline_(instrument_of_penance)
Photos from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flagellant and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discipline_(instrument_of_penance)
|
|
"Mortification of the Flesh"
&
Porn
What happens to a youg girl who is raised in a pornified society? What happens to a young girl who is forced to endure sexual abuse in that society? Why are some girls voluntarily entering into the porn industry when there is so much violence and abuse of females openly portrayed in porn videos?
“Give me a child until he is seven and I will show you the man."
(This saying is apparently credited to Aristotle and St Ignatius Loyola and also to Xavier).
As the early philosophers understood, early childhood influences are very influential on the development of a child's character. The young child absorbs and copies everything in his/her environment uncritically. It not only the sounds of speech and language that the infant learns, but also the gestures of people, the attitudes and importantly the values of parents and others in their environment.
For girls and boys growing up in a pornified society, exposed to abusive pornified culture on a moment by moment basis, it is any wonder that they are groomed and ready to play their part as porn performers - commodities and consumers - in the industry created by the Porn Merchants?
Porn Merchants are insidisous as they actively by covertly groom girls for their role as commodities in the sexual abuse industry. The Porn Merchants take advantage of young girls, especially those who have been sexually abused or those who have been unloved and who grew up in the foster-care system or orphanages. Pimps take advantage of sexually abused young girls with one pimp stating, "the fathers (who abuse their daughters) make it easier for me.' The pimp explains that he doesn't have to use as much force to 'break in' a 'new' girl as he has to use with girl who was not previously sexually abused.
Many young girls and boys who experience sexual abuse, feel powerless. As small children, or teenagers, they could not fight off their abuser. They realise they have been defeated. Their own body let them down as they were not strong enough to overpower their abuser. Their body was not strong enough and their mind was not smart enough to think of a way out, to escape from their abuser. Their body was powerless. Their mind froze with fear under the attack. The boys and girls are angry and fearful of their abuser and they are conscious of this emotion. Less obvious though is the anger they feel against themselves for the perceived betrayal that they committed against themselves. Thoughts emerge when they reflect on what happened to them. "I didn't save me. Why? Why didn't I scream? Why didn't I tell someone? Why didn't I kick him? Why didn't I do something? Then the condemnation begins - as if the child was equal with the abuser; as if he/she had a 'fair' chance to win against their stronger abuser. It is not taken into account that the abuser was physically stronger, older, had been planning the attack. It is not taken into account that he/she was a defenseless child; she was targeted; he was set up.
Reality is ignored.
There was nothing she/he could do to avoid the attack.
Could a child be expected to fight off an adult when he/she is so much weaker in physical strength? The abuser's adult mind was pitted against the child's immature and inexperienced mind.
Would anyone else expect her to be able to protect herself from his attack? No, but she blames herself for not being able to have done so. The failure to do so is perceived as being her fault. Boys reason the same way when they are abused.
This is the source of the self-blame, self-anger and self-hatred. This is the source of the thinking that develops into a desire where the girl (or boy) believes they are deserving of punishment. Sexual activities can become subconsciously anchored to feelings of self-disgust, self-hatred, shame and powerlessness. Self-hatred prompts the acceptance of punishment and abuse. Abuse victims often don't have a self of their true value, but believe and feel that they are defective, a misfit, weird, bad, ugly, repulsive etc. They often becomes willing to accept being abused and punished sexually. When sexual abuse is continually repeated, these thoughts become 'normal' in the child's mind. Sexual activity emphasises the shame and self-hatred that comes with seeing oneself as repulsively disgusting. The anchoring of these self-loathing beliefs and emotions to sexual activity is what is usually necessary to create a porn performer, although the Porn Merchants are making progress recruiting modern porn performer commodities, but advertising their 'positions vacant' with the likes of Madonna, Beyonce, Miley Cyrus etc. If the Porn Merchants can make young girls believe these highly paid prostitutes are 'moviestars,' 'rockstars' and 'sex-goddesses,' then more young victims will follow their lead and shape their lives on their idols.
Where were those who should have been protecting her? Did they act after the abuse to comfort her, to share her rage at the attacker? Did they reassure her that her father/uncle/priest would be facing criminal charges and locked up where he could never hurt her again? Was she allowed to feel valued and that when she was hurt, it mattered to someone other than just her? Was she reassured that someone loved her and cared about her intensely and that they would fight to defend her and try to make her environment safe again?
Or
Was it become a case of,
"Just shut up about it. You're nothing special."
"You're not the only one he's done it to."
"If you say anything you will be responsible for destroying the whole family."
"Do you want your father/uncle/pastor to go jail?"
"Don't say anything. It's our family secret."
"You know you liked it."
If the abused girl receives emotional support, she often recovers extremely well after an abusive experience, however is she does not receive any emotional support after the attack, then a very serious and toxic cycle begins in her mind.
The girl begins to think self-depreciating thoughts such as:
"I am useless.
I am weak.
I am powerless.
I am worthless.
I am disgusting.
I hate myself (for letting myself down).
The self- anger is often not recognised but that does not prevent their self-directed rage damaging their emotional stability and their sense of confidence and security. A core belief that they are 'damaged' begins to replace any self-confidence. While there are different responses to an abusive experience/s, often a 'bad girl' image emerges where punishment is mocked and social/family rules are intentionally broken and rebelled against. Lifestyle often changes drastically. Other abused girls become very introspective and 'closed down' and head into an anxious or depressive state.
Boundaries become a huge problem for abused girls who are emotionally and physically unsupported.
Porn teaches young girls that:
“Give me a child until he is seven and I will show you the man."
(This saying is apparently credited to Aristotle and St Ignatius Loyola and also to Xavier).
As the early philosophers understood, early childhood influences are very influential on the development of a child's character. The young child absorbs and copies everything in his/her environment uncritically. It not only the sounds of speech and language that the infant learns, but also the gestures of people, the attitudes and importantly the values of parents and others in their environment.
For girls and boys growing up in a pornified society, exposed to abusive pornified culture on a moment by moment basis, it is any wonder that they are groomed and ready to play their part as porn performers - commodities and consumers - in the industry created by the Porn Merchants?
Porn Merchants are insidisous as they actively by covertly groom girls for their role as commodities in the sexual abuse industry. The Porn Merchants take advantage of young girls, especially those who have been sexually abused or those who have been unloved and who grew up in the foster-care system or orphanages. Pimps take advantage of sexually abused young girls with one pimp stating, "the fathers (who abuse their daughters) make it easier for me.' The pimp explains that he doesn't have to use as much force to 'break in' a 'new' girl as he has to use with girl who was not previously sexually abused.
Many young girls and boys who experience sexual abuse, feel powerless. As small children, or teenagers, they could not fight off their abuser. They realise they have been defeated. Their own body let them down as they were not strong enough to overpower their abuser. Their body was not strong enough and their mind was not smart enough to think of a way out, to escape from their abuser. Their body was powerless. Their mind froze with fear under the attack. The boys and girls are angry and fearful of their abuser and they are conscious of this emotion. Less obvious though is the anger they feel against themselves for the perceived betrayal that they committed against themselves. Thoughts emerge when they reflect on what happened to them. "I didn't save me. Why? Why didn't I scream? Why didn't I tell someone? Why didn't I kick him? Why didn't I do something? Then the condemnation begins - as if the child was equal with the abuser; as if he/she had a 'fair' chance to win against their stronger abuser. It is not taken into account that the abuser was physically stronger, older, had been planning the attack. It is not taken into account that he/she was a defenseless child; she was targeted; he was set up.
Reality is ignored.
There was nothing she/he could do to avoid the attack.
Could a child be expected to fight off an adult when he/she is so much weaker in physical strength? The abuser's adult mind was pitted against the child's immature and inexperienced mind.
Would anyone else expect her to be able to protect herself from his attack? No, but she blames herself for not being able to have done so. The failure to do so is perceived as being her fault. Boys reason the same way when they are abused.
This is the source of the self-blame, self-anger and self-hatred. This is the source of the thinking that develops into a desire where the girl (or boy) believes they are deserving of punishment. Sexual activities can become subconsciously anchored to feelings of self-disgust, self-hatred, shame and powerlessness. Self-hatred prompts the acceptance of punishment and abuse. Abuse victims often don't have a self of their true value, but believe and feel that they are defective, a misfit, weird, bad, ugly, repulsive etc. They often becomes willing to accept being abused and punished sexually. When sexual abuse is continually repeated, these thoughts become 'normal' in the child's mind. Sexual activity emphasises the shame and self-hatred that comes with seeing oneself as repulsively disgusting. The anchoring of these self-loathing beliefs and emotions to sexual activity is what is usually necessary to create a porn performer, although the Porn Merchants are making progress recruiting modern porn performer commodities, but advertising their 'positions vacant' with the likes of Madonna, Beyonce, Miley Cyrus etc. If the Porn Merchants can make young girls believe these highly paid prostitutes are 'moviestars,' 'rockstars' and 'sex-goddesses,' then more young victims will follow their lead and shape their lives on their idols.
Where were those who should have been protecting her? Did they act after the abuse to comfort her, to share her rage at the attacker? Did they reassure her that her father/uncle/priest would be facing criminal charges and locked up where he could never hurt her again? Was she allowed to feel valued and that when she was hurt, it mattered to someone other than just her? Was she reassured that someone loved her and cared about her intensely and that they would fight to defend her and try to make her environment safe again?
Or
Was it become a case of,
"Just shut up about it. You're nothing special."
"You're not the only one he's done it to."
"If you say anything you will be responsible for destroying the whole family."
"Do you want your father/uncle/pastor to go jail?"
"Don't say anything. It's our family secret."
"You know you liked it."
If the abused girl receives emotional support, she often recovers extremely well after an abusive experience, however is she does not receive any emotional support after the attack, then a very serious and toxic cycle begins in her mind.
The girl begins to think self-depreciating thoughts such as:
"I am useless.
I am weak.
I am powerless.
I am worthless.
I am disgusting.
I hate myself (for letting myself down).
The self- anger is often not recognised but that does not prevent their self-directed rage damaging their emotional stability and their sense of confidence and security. A core belief that they are 'damaged' begins to replace any self-confidence. While there are different responses to an abusive experience/s, often a 'bad girl' image emerges where punishment is mocked and social/family rules are intentionally broken and rebelled against. Lifestyle often changes drastically. Other abused girls become very introspective and 'closed down' and head into an anxious or depressive state.
Boundaries become a huge problem for abused girls who are emotionally and physically unsupported.
Porn teaches young girls that:
- girls need to be sexually attractive to men;
- girls need to display their bodies to get sexual attention from men and that this is normal female sexual behaviour;
- girls should accept abuse in sexual contexts;
- the violence in such contexts is not really violent or abusive - it is sexy;
- the more violence and abuse they can accept, the more sexy the girl is; and
- the more abuse you can 'take,' he more value you have.
Warning - triggering images in Belladonna video
|
Hidden Slavery - Invisible Chains
Women 'exercising their rights' are really enslaved in the sex (trafficking) 'industry.' 
|
The Boys Club
High school boys at St Kevin's College in Melbourne, Australia already 'know' that they are entitled to regard females as sexual reposits for male bodily fluids. Discussion https://theconversation.com/elite-boys-schools-like-st-kevins-were-set-up-to-breed-hyper-masculinity-which-can-easily-turn-toxic-132433 
|
Forceful and dominant: men with sexist ideas of masculinity are more likely to abuse women
https://theconversation.com/forceful-and-dominant-men-with-sexist-ideas-of-masculinity-are-more-likely-to-abuse-women-125873 |
|
"It’s worth noting that the chant the boys were singing (“I wish that all the ladies….”) was not their own invention. It appears to have originated in the US Army as a marching song and is also sung on occasion by male football teams, in all male (and possibly in some mixed) university residential colleges – and by some apparently inebriated male students of Catherine McAuley College in Bendigo just last week."
https://theconversation.com/elite-boys-schools-like-st-kevins-were-set-up-to-breed-hyper-masculinity-which-can-easily-turn-toxic-132433 More perverse lyrics in other verses of the dump truck song here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/rugbyunion/comments/4pgmfo/i_wish_all_the_ladies/ |
See female - evaluate her ability to sexually arouse me.
How does her body rate in the meat market stakes? That is what it is to objectify her. Nothing else matters. Not her character, nor her mind, nor her ability to love, nor her skills, not her intelligence, not her personality and not her sense of humor. Not her humanity. Men take from her to see how she can be used for his indulgence.
How does her body rate in the meat market stakes? That is what it is to objectify her. Nothing else matters. Not her character, nor her mind, nor her ability to love, nor her skills, not her intelligence, not her personality and not her sense of humor. Not her humanity. Men take from her to see how she can be used for his indulgence.
Women are Trained to Become Commodities
"Women and girls are not commodities and must be treated as human beings". This statement was made 6 years ago by Babatunde Osotimehin, the executive director of the UN population fund, UNFPA, at a conference in Stockholm, Sweden during discussion of the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD). https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2014/apr/24/women-human-beings-equal-rights-men
The fact is that women are still treated as commodities. Men are taught the mantra from an early age, "See woman, think sex." In fact, men aren't trained to honour women with a normal sexual response as that response can only occur within healthy, mutually respectful, long term loving relationships. However, men typically fail to respond to a woman with a normal response which would be to treat them as a non-sexualised human being. Men are trained by pornified society, to regard women as opportunities to indulge in sexual thoughts, stimulated by her body's appearance. For non-hypersexualised women being treated in a sexualised manner is frustrating and as a form of sexual abuse. Pornified society is able to destroy a woman's power by disregarding her intellectual contributions or specialised talents/skills, by focusing on her sexual arousal rating. ie her ability to offer the 'viewers' the opportunity to participate in voyeurism in their imagination, without her consent and at her expense. Women have long complained about having to interact with men who 'undressed me with their eyes' or who fondled their body parts without invitation or consent etc. Being treated as a 'sex object' is something to which any normal woman will object. It is to overcome women's resistance at being sex objects, that PIMP EMPIRE depend heavily on presenting all manner of violence and sexual assault and abuse primarily against women, under the guise of 'sex.'
Currently there exists a backlash from many women who are 'fighting fire with fire' arguing that 'what's good for the goose is good for the gander.' Women are viewing and becoming addicted to porn also and like men, they too are becoming sexual predators. Porn is not a respecter of genders and the female brain is just as vulnerable to damage from porn as is the male brain.
"Women and girls are not commodities and must be treated as human beings". This statement was made 6 years ago by Babatunde Osotimehin, the executive director of the UN population fund, UNFPA, at a conference in Stockholm, Sweden during discussion of the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD). https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2014/apr/24/women-human-beings-equal-rights-men
The fact is that women are still treated as commodities. Men are taught the mantra from an early age, "See woman, think sex." In fact, men aren't trained to honour women with a normal sexual response as that response can only occur within healthy, mutually respectful, long term loving relationships. However, men typically fail to respond to a woman with a normal response which would be to treat them as a non-sexualised human being. Men are trained by pornified society, to regard women as opportunities to indulge in sexual thoughts, stimulated by her body's appearance. For non-hypersexualised women being treated in a sexualised manner is frustrating and as a form of sexual abuse. Pornified society is able to destroy a woman's power by disregarding her intellectual contributions or specialised talents/skills, by focusing on her sexual arousal rating. ie her ability to offer the 'viewers' the opportunity to participate in voyeurism in their imagination, without her consent and at her expense. Women have long complained about having to interact with men who 'undressed me with their eyes' or who fondled their body parts without invitation or consent etc. Being treated as a 'sex object' is something to which any normal woman will object. It is to overcome women's resistance at being sex objects, that PIMP EMPIRE depend heavily on presenting all manner of violence and sexual assault and abuse primarily against women, under the guise of 'sex.'
Currently there exists a backlash from many women who are 'fighting fire with fire' arguing that 'what's good for the goose is good for the gander.' Women are viewing and becoming addicted to porn also and like men, they too are becoming sexual predators. Porn is not a respecter of genders and the female brain is just as vulnerable to damage from porn as is the male brain.
|
The 1960's TV series "Gomer Pyle USMC" was deemed to be 'innocent' and many children were regular viewers of the long running series.
Examples: Gomer Pyle, U.S.M.C. - S04E03 - Corporal Carol (DVDRip) Gomer Pyle, U.S.M.C. - S01E04 - Captain Ironpants (DVDRip) Sadly, many girls were indoctrinated with the principles of porn and they were subtly and deliberately introduced to accept their submissive role in the developing Pimp Empire. The Gomer Pyle USMC series deliberately introduced sexism disguised as being positive femininity. By watching the series, young girls and women were indoctrinated to be commodities by Hollywood producer Aaron Ruben. Women and girls were trained to:
|
|
|
In contrast, men are depicted as being super powerful, dominant over women, decision-makers who view and value women not as human-beings equal to themselves, but as legitimate sources of at least visual sexual stimulation.
The ideal man as portrayed by Hollywood, was beyond that of what a normal man could achieve, but that did not prevent Hollywood from insisting men strive to reach that ridiculous non-human standard. Men had to be like Superman! They had to be 'faster than a speeding bullet, more powerful than a locomotive, able to leap tall buildings in a single bound, change the course of mighty rivers' and be 'able to bend steel in his bare hands.' Obviously human men could not do those things, but they could strive to be powerful and dominant like the fictional Superman character. As proof that the man was powerful - a 'superman' could not afford to show any weakness, no sign of emotional pain like tears, no sign of physical pain. Men are indoctrinated with the gospel that they must be tough. They must stop being human to be tough - just like Superman was not human. |
|
|
Women, regardless of their professionality, can not escape being sexually assessed by pornified men.
The female jockey in this video, should only be valued for her professional riding skills and several ladies comment appropriately, however one man feels free to add that "she's not bad looking either." How do men gain the mindset that they are entitled to comment on their assessment of a woman's ability to cause male sexual arousal? Our society trains men to 'see woman, think sex provider.' The section of the video that is referred to above, is from 6 mins to 6:56 https://youtu.be/e01dC6UWXx8 Rawhide
Rawhide is an American Western TV series starring Eric Fleming and Clint Eastwood. The show aired for eight seasons on the CBS network on Friday nights, from January 9, 1959,[1] to September 3, 1965, before moving to Tuesday nights from September 14, 1965, until January 4, 1966, with a total of 217 black-and-white episodes. The series was produced and sometimes directed by Charles Marquis Warren, who also produced early episodes of Gunsmoke. Spanning seven and a half years, Rawhide was the sixth-longest-running American television Western... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rawhide_(TV_series) Rawhide certainly encouraged violence as a legitimate response to feeling powerless or disrespected and as a solution for almost every other problem, but it also encouraged male violence to and subjugation of women. Rawhide is just one of many of the 'new' kinds of TV series/movies that were produced in the 1960-70 era that encouraged male violence to and sexual denigration of women. The denigration, humiliation, disempowerment of women is the principle theme of the porn merchants upon which PIMP EMPIRE is built. It is tragic that this unrealised principle of porn was introduced practically undetected by societies members, and what is true of Rawhide, is also true of many other 'family' TV shows. In the episode called, The Incident of the Married Widow, at 35 minutes into the video, a newly 'married' woman objects to her husband who is caught in the act of selling her business without her knowledge or consent. The 'newly married husband' is instructed by the prospective purchaser (an older man) to 'Use a board, son. Straighten her right out.' The husband takes the older man's advice and proceeds to force his 'wife' to bend over his knees and repeatedly beats her on the backside. The woman is heard screaming, "Stop it! Ow! Stop it! I'll listen. I promise." During the screaming, the older man, the purchaser of the wife's property, mutters to himself, "woman, dog, walnut tree - the more you beat 'em, the better they be." Finally, the 'husband' stops the abuse and the woman drops to the floor. The 'husband' then instructs the woman that they are going to do things his way and that he will sell the property and in fact, he does so without any further objection from the 'wife.' |
|
The Backlash - Women’s Right to Wear Whatever
Visual rape is real. Women inflict it on men all the time, for the same reasons that men inflict rape on women – it’s a power hit.
However while women can appeal to public sympathy when they are victims of rape, a man is not permitted to complain about being visually raped. Instead, if he complains, he is accused of having ‘a dirty mind,’ or of not being able to ‘handle’ the sexual pressure. Men soon learn they are all supposed to cop it in the eye but not verbalise any opposition to the sexualised displays. Women voice loud attempts try to disguise and defend their strategy to gain power, through sexualisation, over men. Women proclaim they have the ‘right’ to wear whatever clothing they wish to select. If men have a problem with their sexual displays, then it is the man’s problem – and the women’s victory!
The logic is totally absent.
Women know that they can use their bodies to invite men to engage with them sexually. For millennia men 'blame' women for using fleshly displays to entice, lure, seduce and tantalise them. Men suggest they have no 'power' over a woman's sexual displays and that is why women are raped. That reasoning is of course garbage. No one can force a man to rape a woman, but the reverse is not reciprocal. Unless a man is blind, he does not have the power to stop himself from being visually raped. Sure he can look away after he has been power-hit by a woman's a sexual display, but he can't ever 'un-see' the image.
Men who do appreciate visual sexual displays will attend strip shows and view porn and express their appreciation with verbal and facial expressions etc. But many men don't appreciate being visually raped or shocked by women who they recognise are seeking to gain a sexualised reaction. This is recognised as being an attempt to gain an unsolicited power hit in response to the visual rape/shock.
Not every man is pornified to the extent that he appreciates being visually raped. Some men still want to keep their sexual responses including the images in their head, within the boundaries of their own private relationships as the marriage vow outlines. It is not the case that the offended man is unable to control his thoughts and body when confronted by explicit sexual displays, but that he is offended at the constant attempt by women to gain his sexual attention. He would like to treat women as equals, professionals and not sexualise them. Don’t women want to be treated equally? Don’t women want to be treated as professionals? Playing the ‘sexual display’ card to gain the looks, the admiration and power, but then trying to defend such a manipulative action as a woman’s ‘right to wear whatever clothing she wants’ is easily seen through. She wants to wear the clothing that gives her a power-hit, an advantage over others. She’s not wearing the high heels, the see through top, the short skirt, the low top, the form-fitting dress for comfort. She’s wearing them for power – power over her female competition and power over men. And the power is most easily obtained when it is sexualised. Sexualised power is cheap, easy to get. Women don’t need to work hard to get a degree at university. They don’t need to get married. They don’t need to learn another language as they are taught the language of sexualisation from a very early age – cartoons like Sleeping Beauty, Snow White, Cinderella; with toys like Barbie Dolls and her clones; movies like Frozen, Game of Thrones etc; music stars/idols like Mylie Cyrus, Katy Perry, Beyonce, Madonna etc. Without massive efforts to protect them, girls will be unavoidably conditioned and manipulated to become sexualised women - female commodities that are essential to make the pornified markets operate. Sexualised men are also necessary and are also conditioned at a very young age by porn culture, to become the consumers. Porn addicted males consume the sexualised female commodities and make the porn merchants money tree grow very well indeed. So it is not accepted that men should complain about being visually raped. It is bad for business.
It is not accepted by pornified society that men can be victims of visual rape. Men are chided that they should 'appreciate' the ‘free’ display just as do ‘all red-blooded males.” Lust in private. Masturbate in private to those images either digital or those images that remain in your memory and imagination. Those are the rules of a pornified society. Those are the rules that ensure the porn merchants stay profitable.
Pornified society convinces men and women that sexual abuse and misuse of the body’s private parts are normal. In reality, true sex is physical, emotional and mental attachment to another person. The communicative connection of sex can not take place in emotionally detached, disconnected, physical activity for entertainment or empowerment purposes. That action is sexual abuse.
One prominent and brave woman is trying to demonstrate the sad situation that occurs when our hypersexualised society inevitably produces sexually inappropriate and abusive interactions between hypersexualised young women and adult men.
Why shouldn't our pornified society - specifically the porn pushers, the porn merchants - have to face the responsibility of their actions?
Pornified society trains, manipulates and conditions its members to become hypersexualised, permanently sexually aroused and poised for sexual behaviour.
Women are primed to be sexual commodities and as commodities, they learn to dress, dance, speak in a hypersexualised manner. Women who won't 'put out' but who 'hold out' for that special man, are bad for the porn business.
Men are primed to be consumers of the female commodity. They have to be 'ever-ready' to perform sexually. The porn merchants know that men must be convinced that it is 'normal' for them to be constantly sexually aroused and that it is essential for them to detach emotionally from any specific woman.
Marriage - or being 'a one-woman-man' is bad for the porn business. Sexual behaviour has to be seen as sport, entertainment - not emotional, not intimate communication.
The porn merchants must protect their billion dollar industry.
Women must be convinced that it is their 'right' to seek power by dressing provocatively. But if men become sexually aroused, as is the intention of the porn merchants, then the women are trained to believe that it is not their responsibility, but the 'dirty, old man's' fault or that 'all men have only one thing on their mind' and have their 'mind in the gutter.' 'Boys will be boys,' they can look but not touch' but this is unnatural and totally untrue. Where in nature is it found that a female will signal a male for sex, but then refuse to mate?
If women dress provocatively, in order to arouse a man's sexual interest, why shouldn't they have to own that intention? I'm not suggesting that an aroused man has any 'right' or entitlement to sexually assault or even approach a woman who is 'advertising' her body with a sexual display. I am suggesting that this is not considerate of the males in society who are visually raped by such unwanted displays.
So many women take the attitude of 'if he gets aroused, that's his problem.' That's simply not fair and it's not true. Hypersexualised women who publicly display their body cause many men to objectify women and these men become conditioned - they develop a feeling of being entitled to look, evaluate any woman based on her ability to arouse them sexually. Feeling entitled to engage sexually even in the imagination, in emotionally detached relationships with women they don't even know, is dangerous and a threat to genuine sexual relationships which are based on emotional intimacy. Even young girls - aged 15 years, are being hypersexualised by the media and its far reaching manipulation and conditioning of children.
When the case of the male tutor who engaged in sexual activity with his 15 year old female student reaches the public, the man is labelled a paedophile, while the 15 year old female is considered the victim. Society knows that many 15 year old females have been engaging in sexual activity and have been hypersexualised for perhaps 2-3 years and are not the same as non-sexualised children of 30 years ago. Modern girls have been mentally and emotionally abused - sexually abused by the porn merchants and are not behaving like normal children anymore. They are hypersexualised for a reason - and the porn merchants know what that reason is. It is to become sexual commodities for their male consumers.
No one should promote the idea that 15 year old females are not still children and that men should be allowed to have sex with them!
Society should be protecting females - young and old - from the media-forced pressure to become hypersexualised. Young girls are educated by our hypersexualised society to find their value in how much sexual approval they can gain from men. Young girls learn to gain sexual approval from males, by dressing, dancing and speaking provocatively. Before long the inappropriate and abusive sexual behaviour occurs between adult men and confused young girls. This social conditioning of our young female children AND adult men, needs to stop so that these types of sexual attacks on young females will also stop. Hypersexualised men and hypersexualised women in a hypersexualised society can't help but result in inappropriate sexual activity and sexual abuse. https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/batty-thrilled-with-government-call-to-remove-arndt-s-gong-calls-for-men-to-join-push-20200130-p53w35.html?fbclid=IwAR0RfMxL_PwFfaEua6qgpoGdn-QezLtIMqSQrAJr-cm9HNoyC_UezZdTkY8
Visual rape is real. Women inflict it on men all the time, for the same reasons that men inflict rape on women – it’s a power hit.
However while women can appeal to public sympathy when they are victims of rape, a man is not permitted to complain about being visually raped. Instead, if he complains, he is accused of having ‘a dirty mind,’ or of not being able to ‘handle’ the sexual pressure. Men soon learn they are all supposed to cop it in the eye but not verbalise any opposition to the sexualised displays. Women voice loud attempts try to disguise and defend their strategy to gain power, through sexualisation, over men. Women proclaim they have the ‘right’ to wear whatever clothing they wish to select. If men have a problem with their sexual displays, then it is the man’s problem – and the women’s victory!
The logic is totally absent.
Women know that they can use their bodies to invite men to engage with them sexually. For millennia men 'blame' women for using fleshly displays to entice, lure, seduce and tantalise them. Men suggest they have no 'power' over a woman's sexual displays and that is why women are raped. That reasoning is of course garbage. No one can force a man to rape a woman, but the reverse is not reciprocal. Unless a man is blind, he does not have the power to stop himself from being visually raped. Sure he can look away after he has been power-hit by a woman's a sexual display, but he can't ever 'un-see' the image.
Men who do appreciate visual sexual displays will attend strip shows and view porn and express their appreciation with verbal and facial expressions etc. But many men don't appreciate being visually raped or shocked by women who they recognise are seeking to gain a sexualised reaction. This is recognised as being an attempt to gain an unsolicited power hit in response to the visual rape/shock.
Not every man is pornified to the extent that he appreciates being visually raped. Some men still want to keep their sexual responses including the images in their head, within the boundaries of their own private relationships as the marriage vow outlines. It is not the case that the offended man is unable to control his thoughts and body when confronted by explicit sexual displays, but that he is offended at the constant attempt by women to gain his sexual attention. He would like to treat women as equals, professionals and not sexualise them. Don’t women want to be treated equally? Don’t women want to be treated as professionals? Playing the ‘sexual display’ card to gain the looks, the admiration and power, but then trying to defend such a manipulative action as a woman’s ‘right to wear whatever clothing she wants’ is easily seen through. She wants to wear the clothing that gives her a power-hit, an advantage over others. She’s not wearing the high heels, the see through top, the short skirt, the low top, the form-fitting dress for comfort. She’s wearing them for power – power over her female competition and power over men. And the power is most easily obtained when it is sexualised. Sexualised power is cheap, easy to get. Women don’t need to work hard to get a degree at university. They don’t need to get married. They don’t need to learn another language as they are taught the language of sexualisation from a very early age – cartoons like Sleeping Beauty, Snow White, Cinderella; with toys like Barbie Dolls and her clones; movies like Frozen, Game of Thrones etc; music stars/idols like Mylie Cyrus, Katy Perry, Beyonce, Madonna etc. Without massive efforts to protect them, girls will be unavoidably conditioned and manipulated to become sexualised women - female commodities that are essential to make the pornified markets operate. Sexualised men are also necessary and are also conditioned at a very young age by porn culture, to become the consumers. Porn addicted males consume the sexualised female commodities and make the porn merchants money tree grow very well indeed. So it is not accepted that men should complain about being visually raped. It is bad for business.
It is not accepted by pornified society that men can be victims of visual rape. Men are chided that they should 'appreciate' the ‘free’ display just as do ‘all red-blooded males.” Lust in private. Masturbate in private to those images either digital or those images that remain in your memory and imagination. Those are the rules of a pornified society. Those are the rules that ensure the porn merchants stay profitable.
Pornified society convinces men and women that sexual abuse and misuse of the body’s private parts are normal. In reality, true sex is physical, emotional and mental attachment to another person. The communicative connection of sex can not take place in emotionally detached, disconnected, physical activity for entertainment or empowerment purposes. That action is sexual abuse.
One prominent and brave woman is trying to demonstrate the sad situation that occurs when our hypersexualised society inevitably produces sexually inappropriate and abusive interactions between hypersexualised young women and adult men.
Why shouldn't our pornified society - specifically the porn pushers, the porn merchants - have to face the responsibility of their actions?
Pornified society trains, manipulates and conditions its members to become hypersexualised, permanently sexually aroused and poised for sexual behaviour.
Women are primed to be sexual commodities and as commodities, they learn to dress, dance, speak in a hypersexualised manner. Women who won't 'put out' but who 'hold out' for that special man, are bad for the porn business.
Men are primed to be consumers of the female commodity. They have to be 'ever-ready' to perform sexually. The porn merchants know that men must be convinced that it is 'normal' for them to be constantly sexually aroused and that it is essential for them to detach emotionally from any specific woman.
Marriage - or being 'a one-woman-man' is bad for the porn business. Sexual behaviour has to be seen as sport, entertainment - not emotional, not intimate communication.
The porn merchants must protect their billion dollar industry.
Women must be convinced that it is their 'right' to seek power by dressing provocatively. But if men become sexually aroused, as is the intention of the porn merchants, then the women are trained to believe that it is not their responsibility, but the 'dirty, old man's' fault or that 'all men have only one thing on their mind' and have their 'mind in the gutter.' 'Boys will be boys,' they can look but not touch' but this is unnatural and totally untrue. Where in nature is it found that a female will signal a male for sex, but then refuse to mate?
If women dress provocatively, in order to arouse a man's sexual interest, why shouldn't they have to own that intention? I'm not suggesting that an aroused man has any 'right' or entitlement to sexually assault or even approach a woman who is 'advertising' her body with a sexual display. I am suggesting that this is not considerate of the males in society who are visually raped by such unwanted displays.
So many women take the attitude of 'if he gets aroused, that's his problem.' That's simply not fair and it's not true. Hypersexualised women who publicly display their body cause many men to objectify women and these men become conditioned - they develop a feeling of being entitled to look, evaluate any woman based on her ability to arouse them sexually. Feeling entitled to engage sexually even in the imagination, in emotionally detached relationships with women they don't even know, is dangerous and a threat to genuine sexual relationships which are based on emotional intimacy. Even young girls - aged 15 years, are being hypersexualised by the media and its far reaching manipulation and conditioning of children.
When the case of the male tutor who engaged in sexual activity with his 15 year old female student reaches the public, the man is labelled a paedophile, while the 15 year old female is considered the victim. Society knows that many 15 year old females have been engaging in sexual activity and have been hypersexualised for perhaps 2-3 years and are not the same as non-sexualised children of 30 years ago. Modern girls have been mentally and emotionally abused - sexually abused by the porn merchants and are not behaving like normal children anymore. They are hypersexualised for a reason - and the porn merchants know what that reason is. It is to become sexual commodities for their male consumers.
No one should promote the idea that 15 year old females are not still children and that men should be allowed to have sex with them!
Society should be protecting females - young and old - from the media-forced pressure to become hypersexualised. Young girls are educated by our hypersexualised society to find their value in how much sexual approval they can gain from men. Young girls learn to gain sexual approval from males, by dressing, dancing and speaking provocatively. Before long the inappropriate and abusive sexual behaviour occurs between adult men and confused young girls. This social conditioning of our young female children AND adult men, needs to stop so that these types of sexual attacks on young females will also stop. Hypersexualised men and hypersexualised women in a hypersexualised society can't help but result in inappropriate sexual activity and sexual abuse. https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/batty-thrilled-with-government-call-to-remove-arndt-s-gong-calls-for-men-to-join-push-20200130-p53w35.html?fbclid=IwAR0RfMxL_PwFfaEua6qgpoGdn-QezLtIMqSQrAJr-cm9HNoyC_UezZdTkY8
Women aren't responsible for men's thoughts - very true. But the whole idea of women stripping off their clothes or dressing provocatively is in fact a veiled effort to control mens' thoughts. When a woman intentionally presents herself in a sexually stimulating way she offers a man an invitation to focus his sexual attention on her and to interact with her on that basis. When he 'takes the bait' and shows his interest in her body, it's a huge power hit for the woman. However, there is a downside for women. If the woman doesn't 'follow through' on what the man regards as being her invitation to pursue sexual interaction, then the man might well feel rejected, feel not good enough and possibly hurt and angry at being set up. Women really want the best of both worlds. They want the adoration and power hit from enjoying male attention, but they don't want the logical conclusion - that the man is going to treat the woman only as a sexual interest. Women want to be able to say through their dress, "You can look, but you can't touch." That's the same message that strippers give their 'clients.' Are strippers responsible for what men think? No, but that doesn't prevent strippers from being spat on, cursed, groped, raped etc. Why are men so angry at women? Maybe, men are like women. Maybe they don't want to be treated like a walking hormone either. Maybe they don't want to be visually raped.
Maybe girls should feel responsible for inflicting visual rapes on boys. Maybe girls should consider that boys don't want to be regarded as walking hormones by women who try to manipulate them against their will.
When girls dress provocatively, they assume that all boys will enjoy looking at their sexual displays. The visually raped boys are forced to respond with one of two thought patterns.
Girls feel entitled to visually rape boys without being held responsible for the sexual stress, mental shock and emotional pain that they cause the boys.
Most boys don’t even realise that they have been hypersexualised by society.
Girls feel entitled to rob boys of their sexual commitment to one girl.
Girls feel entitled to manipulate a boy’s sexuality.
Rivalry between girls – who can get the best sexual response? Girls get a response, but they don’t get respect from the boys.
Provocatively dressed girls reveal that they don’t value themselves and they want to get boys’ attention which will supply some outside value to them.
Hypersexualised girls and boys don’t consider their bodies and their sexual identity as being sacred and valuable.
Young girls exposed to porn accept sexual abuse
Young girls who have been exposed to porn, come to believe that sexual abuse (aka 'rough sex') is normal sex. A young girl will believe that sex involves her having to endure sexual abuse (pain and humiliation) which the boys will enjoy performing on her. Due to her lack of self worth, she has to gain approval from boys. This need drives her to prove she is desirable. Boys want her to give them access to her body, but it is scary to be vulnerable when she knows that the boys are going to hurt her sex organs. But she needs approval of who she is, so she has to toughen up and endure the pain, so that the boys can get sexual satisfaction which means that she will get the boys' approval. Her reward is to know that he got satisfaction from his abuse of her body. That entitles her to be called 'sexy.' Goal achieved.
Girls trained by porn, don't know that real sex is the loving mutual exchange of gentle, painless, pleasurable affection between two people who are in a mutually respectful, permanent, exclusive, caring and exciting relationship together.
BBFC's chief executive David Austin told THE TELEGRAPH that widespread exposure and access to porn bring the "danger of normalizing it for children." One of the study participants, 18 year old Calum from Manchester, told the researchers of his orn-induced assumptions: "I just thought as if [a real sexual experience] was like a porn video and I was like, 'Okay, I can do what I want with this girl because whatever I do she is enjoying it.'" HTTPS://FIGHTTHENEWDRUG.ORG/PARENTS-THIS-STUDY-SHOWS-KIDS-AS-YOUNG-AS-7-ARE-ACCESSING-PORN/?FBCLID=IWAR0HAAGFPIAQ7POY2LR4D0EDDTU2PMCUL9UUQY_OD8TTQ7UMD6RVTV8TKNQ
Maybe girls should feel responsible for inflicting visual rapes on boys. Maybe girls should consider that boys don't want to be regarded as walking hormones by women who try to manipulate them against their will.
When girls dress provocatively, they assume that all boys will enjoy looking at their sexual displays. The visually raped boys are forced to respond with one of two thought patterns.
- A hypersexualised boy will evaluate her body and give it a sexual-arousal rating and compare her body to all the other women’s bodies that he has evaluated previously.
- A normal boy who has fortified his mind against hypersexualisation will regard it as an unwanted invasion, a visual rape – a violation of his sexual identity which is sacred territory and a place where he only intends his wife to occupy.
Girls feel entitled to visually rape boys without being held responsible for the sexual stress, mental shock and emotional pain that they cause the boys.
Most boys don’t even realise that they have been hypersexualised by society.
Girls feel entitled to rob boys of their sexual commitment to one girl.
Girls feel entitled to manipulate a boy’s sexuality.
Rivalry between girls – who can get the best sexual response? Girls get a response, but they don’t get respect from the boys.
Provocatively dressed girls reveal that they don’t value themselves and they want to get boys’ attention which will supply some outside value to them.
Hypersexualised girls and boys don’t consider their bodies and their sexual identity as being sacred and valuable.
Young girls exposed to porn accept sexual abuse
Young girls who have been exposed to porn, come to believe that sexual abuse (aka 'rough sex') is normal sex. A young girl will believe that sex involves her having to endure sexual abuse (pain and humiliation) which the boys will enjoy performing on her. Due to her lack of self worth, she has to gain approval from boys. This need drives her to prove she is desirable. Boys want her to give them access to her body, but it is scary to be vulnerable when she knows that the boys are going to hurt her sex organs. But she needs approval of who she is, so she has to toughen up and endure the pain, so that the boys can get sexual satisfaction which means that she will get the boys' approval. Her reward is to know that he got satisfaction from his abuse of her body. That entitles her to be called 'sexy.' Goal achieved.
Girls trained by porn, don't know that real sex is the loving mutual exchange of gentle, painless, pleasurable affection between two people who are in a mutually respectful, permanent, exclusive, caring and exciting relationship together.
BBFC's chief executive David Austin told THE TELEGRAPH that widespread exposure and access to porn bring the "danger of normalizing it for children." One of the study participants, 18 year old Calum from Manchester, told the researchers of his orn-induced assumptions: "I just thought as if [a real sexual experience] was like a porn video and I was like, 'Okay, I can do what I want with this girl because whatever I do she is enjoying it.'" HTTPS://FIGHTTHENEWDRUG.ORG/PARENTS-THIS-STUDY-SHOWS-KIDS-AS-YOUNG-AS-7-ARE-ACCESSING-PORN/?FBCLID=IWAR0HAAGFPIAQ7POY2LR4D0EDDTU2PMCUL9UUQY_OD8TTQ7UMD6RVTV8TKNQ
Is Nothing Sacred?
How is the religious belief that a wife must submit to her husband, different from the main theme of porn?
Shared Principles of Religious Submission & Female Submission in Porn
We need to detect the tentacles of porn in our everyday lives, including in our religious beliefs.
Shared Principles of Religious Submission & Female Submission in Porn
- a woman's role is to submit to a man's demands;
- a woman is evil/needs punishment if they resist the man's demands;
- a man is entitled to force a woman to submit to his demands;
- love is not part of the submission process;
- a woman must mentally disassociate in order to show an outward submission.
We need to detect the tentacles of porn in our everyday lives, including in our religious beliefs.
Women need to empower themselves by the restoration of their dignity, true femininity and womanhood and resume true equality with men. That empowerment can't be achieved while women are content to manipulate men using their bodies as sexual bait. Who are going to teach men that a woman is worthy of respect when she doesn't respect herself and allows men to disrespect her?
It's not nice being treated as an object and it's not harmless to treat others as objects either.
We can help when you are ready to reclaim your dignified womahood.
It's not nice being treated as an object and it's not harmless to treat others as objects either.
We can help when you are ready to reclaim your dignified womahood.